![]() Wa_audience: "emtaudience:business/btssbusinesstechnologysolutionspecialist/developer/softwaredeveloper", Wa_content_type: "developerreferenceguide", Wa_english_title: "Intel® oneVPL Deep Link Hyper Encode Feature Developer Guide", ![]() Wa_rsoftware: "rsoftware:componentsproducts/inteloneapivideoprocessinglibrary", Wa_emttechnology: "emttechnology:inteltechnologies/oneapi", But it's worth keeping the comparison in mind when considering Intel's overall market position and its recent loss of Apple as a customer.Wa_emtcontenttype: "emtcontenttype:designanddevelopmentreference/developerguide/developerreferenceguide", Granted, if you're buying a PC primarily to play games, it doesn't matter how good the M1 is because it can't run Windows or the games that require Windows. Intel's CPUs are fast (the M1 traded blows with the Core i3 throughout our testing), but Apple's chips use much less power. You'll also note, as we did in our Mac Studio review, the relative inefficiency of Intel's midrange CPUs compared to Apple's M1 chips. The only time that curve is disturbed is when you raise the power limits on the higher-end processors, which gets work done quickly at the cost of efficiency. That means that whatever system can get the work done the most quickly is usually the most efficient. When comparing power efficiency, it's worth noting that when using Intel's stock power settings, full system power consumption in our Handbrake encoding test isn't that different when you're using any of these processors. For the integrated GPU tests, we also used an AMD Ryzen 7 5700G in a Gigabyte B450 Aorus Pro Wifi I motherboard, with 16GB of 3,200 MHz DDR4 RAM.An AMD Ryin a Gigabyte B550M DS3H motherboard, with 16GB of 3,200 MHz DDR4 RAM.The same system with the Core i7-12700 (eight P-cores, four E-cores) installed.The same system with the Core i3-12100 (four P-cores) installed.Tests were run at Intel’s stock power settings and with Asus’ performance boost feature enabled. Intel Core i5-12400 (six P-cores) in an Asus Prime B660-Plus D4 motherboard, with 64GB of 3,200 MHz DDR4 RAM provided by Crucial and a GeForce RTX 3070 FTW3 provided by EVGA.We also threw in the Ryas a comparison point, which used to sell for $200 but hasn't been widely available at that price for a while comparisons to the newer Ryand 5600 CPUs will follow after those chips have been released. We're primarily comparing the Core i3-12100 and Core i5-12400 to their immediate predecessors: the Core i3-10100, the Core i5-10400, and the Core i5-11400. And the Core i3-12100 ( around $150 with a GPU or $120 without) is a quad-core chip that can handle games when paired with a GPU but is ideally suited for browsing, office work and schoolwork, video calls, and anything else you might want from a basic desktop in a home office setup. The Core i5-12400 ( $210 with a GPU, $180-ish without one) is a six-core processor that offers great performance for budget-minded gaming PCs and anyone who wants to do light photo and video editing work without spending tons of money. In anticipation of AMD's new sub-$200 processors, today we're looking at a pair of Intel's best sub-$200 processors in years. And some of it is because the products on offer haven't improved much lately-Intel's best budget and midrange processors were stuck with an aging architecture because of manufacturing problems, and AMD chose to focus on high-end products instead. Some of that is due to ongoing supply issues and a particularly nasty GPU shortage (albeit one that may be very gradually easing). Monitoring with Intel Power Gadget, the 13-inch MacBook Pro was able to maintain its clock speed without unnecessarily throttling down. It hasn't been a great time to build a computer on a budget. Andrew Cunningham reader comments 127 with ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |